|
|
@@ -233,10 +233,10 @@ format to be easy to extend in the future.
|
|
|
=== Why not add some more field here and there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good point. It's pretty hard to define a threshold: should we add a ``slogan`` for a radio? Image? Logo?
|
|
|
-Gallery? Frequency of broadcasting? We applied the principle of sticking to (what we felt was) the bare
|
|
|
-minimum, knowing that the standard is easily extendable, so future needs can be accomodated.
|
|
|
+Gallery? Frequency of broadcasting? We applied the principle of _Fewer format features are better_, knowing
|
|
|
+that the standard is easily extendable, so future needs can be accomodated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-=== Why not extend RSS itself? We could add more info to the ``<channel>>`` tag
|
|
|
+=== Why not extend RSS itself? We could add more info to the ``<channel>`` tag
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's a nice idea. However, we think this would make the adoption harder.
|
|
|
|
boyska