opuppet/puppetlabs-stdlib
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity
puppetlabs-stdlib/spec/functions/has_key_spec.rb

16 lines
1 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently when we changed the method signature for the initializer of Puppet::Parser::Scope instances. This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this: let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope } This patch simply implements this across the board.
2012-07-20 01:14:37 +02:00
require 'spec_helper'
(#8708) Add has_key function It is difficult to use existance of keys in a hash as a boolean condition in Puppet (see #8705) This function provides a working solution until the underlying issue in Puppet can be resolved. Reviewed-by: Jeff McCune
2011-07-30 00:10:13 +02:00
Convert tests to use plain rspec-puppet Tests in the new style produces the following documentation output: abs should not eq nil should run abs() and raise an Puppet::ParseError should run abs(-34) and return 34 should run abs("-34") and return 34 should run abs(34) and return 34 should run abs("34") and return 34
2015-06-01 13:21:59 +02:00
describe 'has_key' do
it { is_expected.not_to eq(nil) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params().and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError, /wrong number of arguments/i) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params("one").and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError, /wrong number of arguments/i) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params("one", "two", "three").and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError, /wrong number of arguments/i) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params("one", "two").and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError, /expects the first argument to be a hash/) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params(1, "two").and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError, /expects the first argument to be a hash/) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params([], "two").and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError, /expects the first argument to be a hash/) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params({ 'key' => 'value' }, "key").and_return(true) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params({}, "key").and_return(false) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params({ 'key' => 'value'}, "not a key").and_return(false) }
(#8708) Add has_key function It is difficult to use existance of keys in a hash as a boolean condition in Puppet (see #8705) This function provides a working solution until the underlying issue in Puppet can be resolved. Reviewed-by: Jeff McCune
2011-07-30 00:10:13 +02:00
end
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink