f3e79ddcd5
Tests in the new style produces the following documentation output:
abs
should not eq nil
should run abs() and raise an Puppet::ParseError
should run abs(-34) and return 34
should run abs("-34") and return 34
should run abs(34) and return 34
should run abs("34") and return 34
36 lines
1.6 KiB
Ruby
Executable file
36 lines
1.6 KiB
Ruby
Executable file
require 'spec_helper'
|
|
|
|
describe 'ensure_packages' do
|
|
it { is_expected.not_to eq(nil) }
|
|
it { is_expected.to run.with_params().and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError) }
|
|
it {
|
|
pending("should not accept numbers as arguments")
|
|
is_expected.to run.with_params(1).and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
|
|
}
|
|
it {
|
|
pending("should not accept numbers as arguments")
|
|
is_expected.to run.with_params(["packagename", 1]).and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
|
|
}
|
|
it { is_expected.to run.with_params("packagename") }
|
|
it { is_expected.to run.with_params(["packagename1", "packagename2"]) }
|
|
|
|
context 'given a catalog with "package { puppet: ensure => absent }"' do
|
|
let(:pre_condition) { 'package { puppet: ensure => absent }' }
|
|
|
|
describe 'after running ensure_package("facter")' do
|
|
before { subject.call(['facter']) }
|
|
|
|
# this lambda is required due to strangeness within rspec-puppet's expectation handling
|
|
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('puppet').with_ensure('absent') }
|
|
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('facter').with_ensure('present') }
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe 'after running ensure_package("facter", { "provider" => "gem" })' do
|
|
before { subject.call(['facter', { "provider" => "gem" }]) }
|
|
|
|
# this lambda is required due to strangeness within rspec-puppet's expectation handling
|
|
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('puppet').with_ensure('absent').without_provider() }
|
|
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('facter').with_ensure('present').with_provider("gem") }
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|