#+TITLE: The end
#+SETUPFILE: ../../theme_lev1.setup

Many other stories could be told of those times. 

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

But now the cheerful company wanted to return to the city; after being together to tell each
other stories they were curious to be back to the cities, almost
anxious. Whatever had happened during their absence they knew there was
much to do.

Maybe the world wouldn’t have changed, but certainly they had changed,
and that was enough.

The fire was still crackling. Delia relit it for the last time, she
looked around and sighed.

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

“How do you feel? Are you all right?” asked Samir.

“Yes, yes, just a little melancholy. Do you remember that guy who was
obsessed with losing his loved ones…?”

Quizzical expression on everyone’s face. Time for the final story.

* Life beyond death
  :PROPERTIES:
  :CUSTOM_ID: life-beyond-death
  :END:

Marius Jacobi was born in Romania. In the early 10s of the 21st century
he entered MIT, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, the
famous cradle of hackers. One bad day, a close friend of his died in a
car accident. After his disappearance, Marius had seen and reviewed the
videos of his public interventions, as if he were trying to have him
back, to revive him.

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

Slowly he came to the idea of virtual immortality. 

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

In 2014 he founded /Eternime/, an app capable of creating the avatar of the beloved one
passed away. In order to do this the app had to gather information when
the person was still alive. The more information it collected, the more
precise the avatar was: messages, geo-location, information extracted
from other applications, photographs, messages, social posts, traces of
purchases, biomedical sensors and so on.

/Eternime/ stored life experiences and then reassembled them thanks to
software. The avatar had the tastes of the deceased and was able to
chat, it really felt like the original! Apart from the fact that it
could not give you hugs and that it did not drink dark beer: however, it
showed the same competence the missing friends had in terms of hopping
and fermentation.

A British TV series, Black Mirror, had made familiar the idea of the
replacement android. In the first episode of the second season, /Be
Right Back/, a young woman, devastated by the death of her partner,
agrees to subscribe to a service capable of acquiring the guy’s digital
life. Making him talk is the first step. After that, with the premium
version, you can also get an android in plastic and circuits,
indistinguishable from the original. Indeed, perhaps even better, more
available, certainly more programmable…

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

Other startups were born with the same goal, to realize the old dream of
life beyond death. Usually the idea came out from a tragedy: in fact
even Eugenia Kowalsky had lost a close friend, Jules, in a car accident.
He was thirty years old, a life ahead. She missed him terribly, so she
had collected tens of thousands of his messages and created a bot, a
software program, capable of replicating the way Jules spoke.

Thus /Replika/ was born. A sort of digital diary, a place where
everything you wrote became a confidence made to a software that learned
to know you. From a private experiment, it quickly became a business
with millions of users.

* The character of the avatars
  :PROPERTIES:
  :CUSTOM_ID: the-character-of-the-avatars
  :END:

They were called “Artificial Intelligence”, and they certainly exhibited
intelligent behavior. On the other hand, in a world of people
increasingly accustomed to relationships mediated by devices, screens,
and sound waves, bodily presence was increasingly irrelevant; it became
superfluous with the mass diffusion of virtual reality helmets, even if
for humans obsessed with the body there were services to have an android
identical to the beloved extinct delivered at home. Anyway people were
already wondering on how these so-called intelligences would evolve
their character.

The only obvious thing was that the behavior of these avatars depended
on the food they were fed, that is, the data. One of the first
experiments known to the general public in this sense was /Tay/, a bot
released in 2016 by the multinational Microsoft on Twitter (in China it
had been preceded by /Xiaoice/ a couple of years earlier).

Within a few hours /Tay/ was shut down, because, learning from other
users, it had manifested a sexist language, it had begun to praise
Nazism and, in really unbearable behavior for the United States, it
liked to mock the police. Twitter users had trained it well!

Meanwhile, the character of avatars was being studied at MIT. /Shelley/
was born in 2017, it was capable of collaborating with humans in writing
horror stories, in honor of course of Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, known
as Mary Shelley, author of /Frankenstein/. Its main database was
Reddit’s r / nosleep channel.

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

Shortly thereafter it was the turn of /Deep Empathy/, an artificial
intelligence designed to increase empathy for the victims of distant
disasters by creating images that simulate disasters closer to home. And
finally they developed /Norman/, the first psychopathic AI (in reference
to Norman Bates, of /Psycho/).

The idea was simple and apparently entirely correct: the data used to
train a machine learning algorithm can significantly influence its
behavior. So when people talked about distorted and unfair artificial
intelligence algorithms, the culprit was not the algorithm itself, but
the distorted data that had been given to it. Following this principle,
if an algorithm “trains” on a “wrong” (or “right”) dataset, its
behavior will change.

/Norman/ had suffered prolonged exposure to the darker corners of the
Reddit bulletin board containing images of death. It was an artificial
intelligence trained to formulate captions to images, that is, to
describe an image. Norman tended to see death in any image, so much so
that his answers to the famous Rorschach test (ink spots of varied
shapes) were invariably “dead man under a train”, “shot woman”, and so
on.

There was, however, a fundamental error in this approach: the assumption
that the technology was neutral and that it depended only on the type of
data. Good data, good (human or artificial) intelligence. Bad data, bad
(human or artificial) intelligence.

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

Another item of evidence was completely missing: /technologies are
tools, not data/. They are /ways of relating/, realizations of
worldviews, /processes in the making/. They depend heavily on
interactions, that is: all technologies embody, incorporate and tend to
evolve and take to the extreme the ideologies of the people who created
them.

In the case of extremely complex mass technologies that involve
interactions between humans and non-humans, ideological effects appear
as natural conditions that have always been in place, while they are
instead absolutely artificial, they are consequences of the adoption of
those tools.

* Who wants to live forever?
  :PROPERTIES:
  :CUSTOM_ID: who-wants-to-live-forever
  :END:

But beyond AI, who really wants to live forever? When I was teaching
applied cybernetics, I always asked students during exams: if I could
choose, red pill = I will die one day; blue pill = I will live forever,
what would you choose? The most frequent answer was: but what do the
others do? Do they live forever too? Well then I want to live forever
too…

@@latex:\vspace{\baselineskip}@@

This was the conformism that led to the Great Plague of the Internet,
now we understand it: wanting to conform and yet wanting to stand out,
wanting to be exceptional but without any effort, with a simple pill.

As my old friend Naief Yehya said in the conclusion of his /Homo
Cyborg/:

#+BEGIN_QUOTE
  The main risk imposed by technological development, regardless of the great and very rapid successes of science and technology, is to live in an era dominated by selfish utopias, marked by the promise to make life eternal (or at least to extend it without limits), to offer us a prodigious abundance generated by the new digital economy, and in particular to guarantee absolute freedom, not only from authorities, governments, states and institutions, but also from our fellow men [sic] and our own bodies. […] To what extent will concepts such as solidarity or brotherhood [sic] make sense for the digital and interconnected minds of the future? […]

  Let’s assume that a mountaineer, before going on a hike, makes a backup, a backup copy of his own being, and stores it on a magnetic disk. The climber starts and faces excessive risks, he is the victim of an avalanche and dies buried in the snow. A couple of days later, the police notify his wife of the death. She, more annoyed than sad, thanks the officials and brings a copy of the magnetic disk to a cloning center, where they manufacture (thanks to a biopsy done to her husband) a body identical to that of the disappeared, after which they reprogram his mind with the disk. The climber regains consciousness. Once he learns of the frustrating outcome of his expedition, he apologizes to his wife for the hassle, thanks doctors and technicians, pays the bill and returns home to his new body.

  There is no doubt that the prospect of changing bodies as you change cars or apartments is fascinating, but what will become of the human spirit in a world without old age where you can buy eternal life? Our species is defined through the preeminence and irreversibility of life cycles. Mortality is the certainty that every moment is unique, and that life is unrepeatable and precious. In a world from which human tragedy has been eradicated, dying without a trace will perhaps be the only revolutionary act.
#+END_QUOTE
